top of page

Unravelling the Cognitive Landscape of Racism

By: Jimbo Matthew

In the ever-evolving realm of human cognition, the intricacies of biases and prejudices are a topic a profound significance. Understanding the underpinnings of racial biases can pave the way for more harmonious societies that values diversity and inclusion.  Join me as I delve into the depths of cognitive systems, societal influences, and historical constructs that have sculpted our perceptions of race over time.  

 

Central to our understanding of biases lies a pivotal theory: the systems approach, first advanced by renowned psychologist Daniel Kahneman. This theory posits two systems of thought: a rapid, instinctual system that allows for quick decisions (system 1), and a deliberate, analytical system for more complex judgments (system 2). While the faster system is efficient for immediate reactions, its reliance on pre-existing schemas and heuristics can inadvertently lead to the formation and reinforcement of biases.  

 

When examining racial biases, it's essential to recognize that these biases are not purely a product of individual cognition but are deeply intertwined with societal constructs and historical narratives. For instance, the way societies have historically perceived and treated different racial groups has undeniably influenced individual biases. The antiquated beliefs of certain scientists about distinctive racial features, though now debunked by modern biotechnology, continue to cast a shadow on the collective consciousness of many societies. These historical misconceptions, coupled with media portrayals and stereotypes, further cement racial biases. 

 

The dynamics between Africans and the English in history provide a vivid illustration of how biases can become deeply entrenched within societies. Systematic marginalization of certain groups and the perpetuation of power imbalances have led to biases being passed down through generations. This historical baggage reveals a striking truth: many individuals' perceptions are not solely their own but are influenced by the weight of generations that came before them. 

 

However, a ray of hope emerges when observing the interactions of children.  Liberated societal constructs and uninfluenced by media or historical narratives, children interact without the cloud of prejudice. Their innate ability to see beyond superficial differences demonstrates that biases are learned, not inborn. As these children mature, their untainted perceptions begin to change, moulded by the influences around them—be it family, media, education, or peer interactions.  

 

Social psychology offers further insights into this phenomenon. The Social Identity Theory, for instance, suggests that people have an inherent need to categorize themselves and others into groups. This categorization, while natural, can lead to in-group favouritism and out-group discrimination. Remarkably, when race becomes a criterion for such categorizations, it can result in racial biases, even if unintentional.  

 

Moreover, the role of cultural narratives and societal norms cannot be understated. Across different cultures, various attributes, practices, and values are emphasized. For instance, the reverence for classical music in certain Asian cultures, contrasted with its perception in Western societies, can influence biases. Such cultural nuances shape our automatic categorizations and wield a profound influence over our daily interactions. 

 

Another dimension to consider is the role of education and awareness. While biases may be deeply rooted, they are not immutable. Through education, introspection, and exposure to diverse perspectives, individuals can challenge and reshape their biases. Societal initiatives, inclusive curriculums, and media representation can play pivotal roles in this transformation.  

 

In summation, the issue of racial bias is far from simple; it arises from the intricate interplay between individual cognition, societal constructs, historical narratives, and cultural influences. While the challenge of overcoming these biases is monumental, a multi-faceted approach involving education, awareness, and introspection offers a beacon of hope.  Understanding the origins of these biases empowers us to take proactive steps. It leads us on a collective journey, one that strives for the creation of a society that values inclusivity and empathy. The challenges are undeniable, but as we stand at the crossroads of progress, it is our responsibility to embark on this path of transformation—one that ultimately paves the way for a brighter and more equitable future. 

 



Arthur, W. Brian. “Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality.” The American Economic Review, vol. 84, no. 2, 1994, pp. 406–11. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117868. Accessed 1 Nov. 2023. 

 

Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, 1979, pp. 263–91. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185. Accessed 1 Nov. 2023.

bottom of page